Começa agora

Contar o Dronetrake · Artigos

The sources, country by country: protected areas and drone maps

The register behind “The second map”. For each country: how many nature zones the UAS file has, what the official map shows, which law governs flying and who authorises it, with the links and the quoted sentences. Read on 23 September 2026.

Verificado em 23 September 2026 — reverificado em 23 September 2026

Idiomas: Italiano · English · Français · Deutsch · Español

Este artigo ainda não está traduzido para a língua do site: está a lê-lo em English.

This page is the register behind the article “The second map”. Every row has the link to the source and the sentence that decides it, copied word for word in the original language. The twin register, on UAS zones, is here.

All sources were read on 23/09/2026, unless another date is given.

How it was done

  • UAS files. Each file was downloaded from its official address, without an account, and counted line by line.
    • We count the zones with reason NATURE. Where that field is missing, we use the equivalent field in the file's own language: the authority «Náttúruverndarstofnun» for Iceland, the layer «TNP_WGS» for Slovenia, the layers naturschutzgebiete, nationalparks, ffh-gebiete and vogelschutzgebiete for Germany, the files LKR318A/B/C for Czechia.
  • Quoted sentences. They are copied from the official page or PDF, and every page that decides something is archived as a screenshot with its SHA-256 hash.
    • The others were read from the text of the downloaded page or PDF. Only the Norwegian regulations (Lovdata answers scripts with 405) were read in the browser.
  • Pages that would not open. A page that would not open, or that asked for a login, is marked "not verified", with the reason. No form was filled in. Only the terms of the Estonian (utm.eans.ee) and Lithuanian (utm.ans.lt) maps and the two notices of the Polish map (dronemap.pansa.pl) were accepted. The GoDrone disclaimer («Ok» button) and the information windows of airspace.lv were also closed.
  • Italy. Postponed on request: the d-flight file requires an operator login.

AL — Albania

  • UAS file: no public file found · 0 NATURE zones · what they are: —
  • Official map: https://www.aac.gov.al/avione-pa-pilote-drone/ · nothing on protected areas
  • Law: Ligj 81/2017 «Për zonat e mbrojtura», neni 16, pika 4, lett. ç — https://bashkiaskrapar.gov.al/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/LIGJ-nr.-81-dat%C3%AB-4.5.2017.pdf (2017 text published on a municipal website; the qbz.gov.al portal returns no text) · «Me propozim me shkrim dhe të arsyetuar të administratës së ruajtjes së zonës, AKZM-ja mund të miratojë: … ç) fluturime joushtarake me helikopterë, balona, deltaplane etj;» (en: in national parks the AKZM may approve non-military flights by helicopters, balloons, hang-gliders etc.). It does not mention drones.
  • Who authorises: AKZM, the National Agency for Protected Areas, on a proposal from the area's administration — same link
  • The article said: “no — no UAS zone map” · Does it change? no. The legal basis should be added, though it does not mention drones.

AT — Austria

  • UAS file: https://www.austrocontrol.at/jart/prj3/ac/releases/de/upload/Dronespace/UASZones-ACG-20260921-160300-full-production.zip · version of 21/09/2026 · 2 NATURE zones out of 289 · what they are: the flight restriction areas «Flugbeschränkungsgebiet Neusiedler-see (LO R 16)» and «Flugbeschränkungsgebiet Rheindelta (LO R 18)», that is Lake Neusiedl and the Rhine delta. The UTM GeoJSON https://utm.dronespace.at/avm/utm/uas.geojson has 1 out of 293 (Rheindelta).
  • Official map: https://www.dronespace.at/geo_zonen/allgemeine_informationen · «Naturschutzgebiete sind derzeit nicht im Austro Control Dronespace System abgebildet»
  • Law:
    • Nature protection is a matter for the Länder. Example, Oö. Verordnung Managementpläne Nationalpark Kalkalpen, LGBl. 4/2026, § 14 Abs. 3 — https://ris.bka.gv.at/eli/lgbl/OB/2026/4/P14/LOO40026701 · «Die Verwendung von Drohnen oder das Überfliegen des Nationalparks mit motorbetriebenen Luftfahrzeugen oder mit Segelflugzeugen unter 500 m Flughöhe ist ausschließlich nur zu wissenschaftlichen oder nationalparkbezogenen Zwecken im Einvernehmen mit der Nationalparkgesellschaft zulässig.» (en: drones only for scientific or park purposes, in agreement with the park company)
    • For LO R 16 and LO R 18: LVR 2014, Anhang B Teil A — https://ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/ii/2014/297/ANL2/NOR40268458 · «Wenn öffentliche Interessen – insbesondere Interessen der Sicherheit der Luftfahrt oder Wildschutzinteressen – nicht entgegenstehen, hat die Austro Control GmbH auf Antrag Bewilligungen … zu erteilen.»
  • Who authorises: the Land authority or the park body (Kalkalpen: Nationalparkgesellschaft); Austro Control for LO R 16 and LO R 18; for the Neusiedler See also the Burgenländische Landesregierung — https://www.dronespace.at/geo_zonen/flugbeschraenkungsgebiete
  • The article said: “no — law only, in each Land's nature protection act” · Does it change? yes: the official file contains 2 NATURE zones (the bird sanctuaries of the Neusiedler See and the Rheindelta). From "not at all" to "partly, 2 zones".

BA — Bosnia and Herzegovina

  • UAS file: no public file found · 0 · —
  • Official map: https://www.bhdca.gov.ba/index.php/bs/info-2 · nothing on protected areas
  • Law: Zakon o Nacionalnom parku "Una" (FBiH, 2008), čl. 8, st. 1, t. 8 — https://www.fbihvlada.gov.ba/bosanski/zakoni/2008/zakoni/19hrv.htm · «8) letenje motornim letjelicama, osim letenja u međunarodnom zračnom prometu;» (en: in the zones of strict protection, flying motorised aircraft is banned). It is the law of a single park, not a general rule.
  • Who authorises: the park's public enterprise — same link · «Za letenje nad područjem stroge i usmjerene zaštite radi geodetskog i filmskog snimanja potrebno je pribaviti suglasnost javnoga poduzeća.»
  • The article said: “no — no BHDCA zone map” · Does it change? no

BE — Belgium

  • UAS file: https://map.droneguide.be/ows, WFS service, layer geo_zone_fast · read on 23/09/2026 · 0 nature zones out of 1,452 · the type_code field has 39 values (TIME_ZONE, NOTAM, CIV_MODEL_TERRAIN, MIL_DOMAIN, CIV_PRISON, ROYAL_ESTATES, …) and none concerns nature. The other layers of the service (airport, airspace, notam, uaszone…) have no nature category.
  • Official map: https://map.droneguide.be · no nature layer. The INBO website (Flanders) writes that the restriction zones over nature areas will be «via het centraal platform https://map.droneguide.be ontsloten», that is, they will be published on that map — https://www.vlaanderen.be/inbo/projecten/vliegbeperkingen-boven-natuurgebieden-swo
  • Law:
    • Flanders: Natuurdecreet 21/10/1997, art. 35 §2, 12° — https://codex.vlaanderen.be/Portals/Codex/documenten/1005915.html · «12° het terrein op geringe hoogte te overvliegen of er te landen met vliegtuigen, helikopters, luchtballons en andere luchtvaartuigen van om het even welke aard.»
    • Wallonia: loi du 12/07/1973 sur la conservation de la nature, art. 11, as amended by the décret of 14/02/2019. Text quoted by the Constitutional Court, judgment 106/2021 — https://www.const-court.be/public/f/2021/2021-106f.pdf · «Dans les réserves naturelles, il est interdit : … - d'effectuer un survol avec un drone ». Wallex does not open: read only through the judgment.
  • Who authorises: Flanders, Agentschap Natuur en Bos — https://natuurenbos.vlaanderen.be/toegankelijkheid-en-activiteiten/activiteiten-organiseren · «Ontheffing van dit verbod is in uitzonderlijke gevallen mogelijk. Neem daarvoor contact op met AVES.» · Wallonia: not verified.
  • The article said: “no — law only: the Flemish Nature Decree…” · Does it change? no in the class. The explicit drone ban in Walloon reserves should be added, and the data service can now be cited in full (1,452 zones, none about nature).

BG — Bulgaria

  • UAS file: https://uas.caa.bg/api/common/GvaMap/ExportZonesJson («Изтегляне на JSON» button on https://uas.caa.bg/) · «BGRZoneVersion 23-09-2026» · 4 NATURE zones out of 881 · what they are: Sofia water-supply sites (the «Бели Искър» dam, the «Бистрица» and «Панчарево» treatment plants, the «Кубратово» wastewater plant), not natural areas
  • Official map: https://uas.caa.bg/ · nothing on protected areas
  • Law:
    • Закон за защитените територии, чл. 21, т. 16 — http://www5.moew.government.bg/wp-content/uploads/filebase/Nature/Legislation/Zakoni/ZZT.pdf (version updated to DV 66/2013) · «В националните паркове се забраняват: … 16. други дейности, определени със заповедта за обявяване на защитената територия и плана за управление.»
    • Example, management plan of Pirin NP (РМС 646/2004) — https://pirin.bg/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Plan-za-uprav.pdf · «Не се разрешава летене под сто метра над земята с каквото и да е летателно средство (хеликоптери, делта планери, парапланери и др.)…» (en: flying below 100 m with any aircraft is not allowed)
  • Who authorises: the national park directorate (ДНП) — same plan
  • The article said: “no, in practice — file with 881 zones; its 4 NATURE zones are Sofia water-supply sites”, with the version of 30/07/2026 · Does it change? no in the outcome. The source should be updated: today the file of the day is on uas.caa.bg, version of 23/09/2026.

CH — Switzerland

CY — Cyprus

  • UAS file: https://drones.gov.cy/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/CYPRUS_GEO_ZONES_MAP_ver09.kmz · «CYPRUS GEO ZONES MAP ver09» (July 2026) · 0 nature zones out of 141 · the zones are airports, ΑΗΚ power installations, hospitals, ΕΦ military sites, embassies, ports and police stations. From a script the site asks for a captcha: the file was downloaded in the browser.
  • Official map: https://drones.gov.cy/geo-zones-map/ · nothing on protected areas
  • Law: no drone-specific rule. Ν. 153(Ι)/2003, art. 21(2) — https://www.cylaw.org/nomoi/enop/non-ind/2003_1_153/full.html · «Απαγορεύεται, στην περιοχή φυσικής κατανομής τους, η εκ προθέσεως παρενόχληση των ειδών πανίδας κοινοτικού ενδιαφέροντος…» (en: intentional disturbance of species of Community interest is banned)
  • Who authorises: not verified
  • The article said: “no — archived copy of the file of 01/01/2026: 144 zones, none NATURE” · Does it change? no in the outcome. The source should be updated: file ver09, 141 zones, none about nature.

CZ — Czechia

DE — Germany

  • UAS file: DIPUL WFS https://uas-betrieb.de/geoservices/dipul/ows, 31 layers · read on 23/09/2026 · 14,314 nature zones out of 87,928 · what they are: naturschutzgebiete 9,012, ffh-gebiete 4,544, vogelschutzgebiete 742, nationalparks 16
  • Official map: https://www.dipul.de/homepage/de/informationen/geografische-gebiete/wfs-wms/ · layers «Naturschutzgebiete», «Nationalparks», «FFH-Gebiete», «Vogelschutzgebiete»
  • Law: LuftVO § 21h Abs. 3 Nr. 6 — https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/luftvo_2015/__21h.html · «über Naturschutzgebieten im Sinne des § 23 Absatz 1 des Bundesnaturschutzgesetzes, über Nationalparks im Sinne des § 24 … wenn die zuständige Naturschutzbehörde dem Betrieb ausdrücklich zugestimmt hat …»
  • Who authorises: the competent Naturschutzbehörde (Land authority) — same provision
  • The article said: “yes — file (DIPUL GeoJSON and ED-318) …” · Does it change? no. The total today is 87,928, against the article's 87,923.

DK — Denmark

EE — Estonia

  • UAS file: https://utm.eans.ee/avm/utm/uas.geojson · read on 23/09/2026 · 31 «Nature» zones out of 247 · what they are: «EER…FAUNA» zones, restriction NO_RESTRICTION, message «You must have a permission from the Estonian Environmental Board.»
  • Official map: https://utm.eans.ee/avm/. Terms accepted on 23/09/2026. The FAUNA zones are drawn in green. Clicking a zone shows «EER4FAUNA» and «You must have a permission from the Estonian Environmental Board. The written application must be sent to info@keskkonnaamet.ee.», H24, «SFC → 120 M AGL».
  • Law: Vabariigi Valitsuse korraldus 25.08.2022 nr 229, p. 5.2 and p. 5.4 — https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/326082022001 · «Geograafilised alad mehitamata õhusõiduki lendamise piiramiseks keskkonnakaitse eesmärgil on punktis 2 sätestatud alad … Objekti valdajaks on Keskkonnaamet.»
  • Who authorises: Keskkonnaamet — same act, p. 5.4 · «…võib lend toimuda ainult objekti valdaja loa alusel…»
  • The article said: “yes, as information — file: 31 "FAUNA" zones out of 235” · Does it change? no. The total today is 247. The map confirms that the zones are visible to the pilot.

FI — Finland

FR — France

GB — United Kingdom

GE — Georgia

  • UAS file: no public file found · — · —
  • Official map: https://uas.gov.ge/EN · nothing
  • Law:
    • Law on the system of protected areas (no. 136 of 07/03/1996), consolidated version of 28/05/2026, read in the browser — https://matsne.gov.ge/en/document/view/32968. The English text contains none of «aircraft», «flight», «fly», «airspace», «drone» or «unmanned». The law does not regulate flying.
    • The management plan of the Lagodekhi protected areas (https://matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/view/2909716) mentions drones only as a ranger tool: «უპილოტო საფრენი აპარატები (დრონი)».
    • The closest basis remains GCAA Order no. 156/2020, art. 3 — https://gcaa.ge/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/UAS-Operation-Rules-GCAA.pdf: zones may restrict flying «…საავიაციო უშიშროებასთან და გარემოს დაცვასთან დაკავშირებული რისკების პრევენციის მიზნით;» (en: also to protect the environment).
  • Who authorises: no body named by any rule. The GCAA establishes the zones (Order 156, art. 16).
  • The article said: “not verified” · Does it change? yes: no file, no zone map, and the protected areas law does not regulate flying. From "not verified" to "not at all".

GR — Greece (not in the article)

  • UAS file: no public file · — · —
  • Official map: https://dagr.hasp.gov.gr/ (Drone Aware GR), opened in the browser. The layers are «Active / future limitations», «Active / future warnings», «Active / future permitted fragments» and «Hellenic airspace data (validity: June 2016)» (CTR, ATZ, LGR, LGD, LGP, LGC). No layer for protected areas. The HCAA page lists as yellow and magenta zones only «Airports, Archaeological Sites» — https://hcaa.gov.gr/en/where-you-are-allowed-fly-uas-greece.
  • Law: not verified. The only source found is the website of Samaria Park, which cites Δ/ΥΠΑ/21860/1422 (ΦΕΚ 3152/Β/2016), but today it returns a critical error, in the browser too. uas.hcaa.gov.gr is blocked by the extension, and uas.hcaa.gr does not open.
  • Who authorises: not verified
  • The article said: — (absent) · Does it change? to be added: "not at all" on the map; the law remains not verified

HR — Croatia

  • UAS file: no file to download. The official app https://amc.crocontrol.hr/ («Karta stanja (anonimni korisnici)») receives the UAS zones without a login through its data channel (SignalR, hub «amchub», message «SRVC_DroneReservations»). Read on 23/09/2026 without an account: 0 nature zones out of 44 (27 URG, 17 ULG), valid until 2030. They are airports (codes LD…), heliports («URG H …») and zones named after places (Žitnjak, Sisak, Omišalj, Virje, Slavonski Brod, LDURG40/41, OS1). None has the name or location of a park. The same message also contains flight bookings with third parties' names: they were not kept.
  • Official map: https://www.ccaa.hr/5 · «Za prikaz zemljopisnih područja UAS-a na prostoru Republike Hrvatske u upotrebi je službeni alat Hrvatske kontrole zračne plovidbe, AMC portal.» No category for protected areas.
  • Law: Pravilnik o zaštiti i očuvanju NP Plitvička jezera (NN 80/2021), čl. 36 st. 5 — https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2021_07_80_1488.html · «Na području Nacionalnog parka zabranjeno je snimanje bespilotnom letjelicom iz zraka osim u iznimnim slučajevima uz odobrenje Ustanove.» The framework law, Zakon o zaštiti prirode, contains no flight ban.
  • Who authorises: the park body (Javna ustanova NP Plitvička jezera) — same link. The flight must also be authorised by Hrvatska kontrola zračne plovidbe.
  • The article said: “no — park regulations only, for example Plitvice” · Does it change? no. It is now also verified on the AMC map: 44 zones, none about nature.

HU — Hungary

  • UAS file: no public file · — · —
  • Official map: https://ais.hungarocontrol.hu/uas-legterkorlatozasok · «Korlátozott légtérben pilóta nélküli légijármű az adott légtér igénybevételére vonatkozó szabályok figyelembevételével működtetethető.» No nature layer named.
  • Law:
  • Who authorises: the aviation authority (4/1998, 5/B. § (3)) · «A korlátozott légtér igénybevételét a légiközlekedési hatóság legfeljebb harminc napra engedélyezheti.»
  • The article said: “no — law only … (Act LIII of 1996, §35)” · Does it change? no. Decree 4/1998, which mentions drones, should be added.

IE — Ireland

IS — Iceland

IT — Italy

  • UAS file: d-flight · postponed: the file requires an operator login
  • Official map: https://www.enac.gov.it/sicurezza-aerea/droni/zone-geografiche-space/voli-con-droni-uas-limitazioni-riserve-dello/ · d-flight also has «zone per motivi di protezione ambientale»
  • Law: L. 394/1991, art. 11 para. 3 let. h — https://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:legge:1991-12-06;394~art11 · «h) il sorvolo di velivoli non autorizzato, salvo quanto definito dalle leggi sulla disciplina del volo.» Penalty in art. 30 para. 1 (arrest of up to six months or a fine).
  • Who authorises: the park authority (Ente Parco); ENAC approves the ban and publishes it on d-flight — same ENAC link · «sono proibite al sorvolo solo quelle aree in corrispondenza dei Parchi il cui divieto è stato approvato dall'ENAC ed è quindi stato pubblicato sulla piattaforma d-flight.»
  • The article said: “partly — d-flight file: 313 NATURE zones out of 4,627” · Does it change? to be verified, after the login

LI — Liechtenstein (not in the article)

  • UAS file: inside the Swiss file (same link as CH) · 0 out of 3 (LSXB Balzers ×2, Castle of Vaduz)
  • Official map: https://www.landespolizei.li/informationen/drohnen · refers to the FOCA map, «welche auch in Liechtenstein ihre Anwendung findet»
  • Law: not found. The NSchG and 14 ordinances on protected areas on gesetze.li mention neither drones nor aircraft.
  • Who authorises: for drones in general the Amt für Hochbau und Raumplanung, Zivilluftfahrt (same link); for protected areas not verified
  • The article said: — (absent) · Does it change? to be added: not at all in the file, law not found

LT — Lithuania

  • UAS file: https://utm.ans.lt/avm/utm/uas.geojson · read on 23/09/2026 · 1 nature zone out of 340 (341 on the map at 12:10). No zone has reason NATURE: it is identified by its contact. It is «UP0080», reason «Other», restriction PROHIBITED, over Žuvintas, with the message «Prohibited geographical zone. Flights are only possible with permission from the responsible authorities. Contact: dzukija.suvalkija@saugoma.lt +370 682 26132», that is the Dzūkija-Suvalkija directorate of the State Service for Protected Areas (domain saugoma.lt). The other Other zones are mostly Litgrid power lines and military sites. I had missed this zone in this morning's first count.
  • Official map: https://utm.ans.lt/avm/. Terms accepted on 23/09/2026. Zone UP0080 appears in yellow with the same message. The map has no layers or legend for protected areas.
  • Law: Specialiųjų žemės naudojimo sąlygų įstatymas XIII-2166, art. 77 para. 1 point 3 — https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/46c841f290cf11e98a8298567570d639/asr · «Ornitologiniuose draustiniuose draudžiama: … 3) skraidyti orlaiviais su varikliu (varikliais) žemesniame kaip vieno kilometro aukštyje…» It does not mention drones.
  • Who authorises: not verified. The LTSA writes that protected-area bodies may request prohibited zones and grant permits «pagal savo nustatytą tvarką», under their own procedures — https://ltsa.lrv.lt/lt/naujienos/dronams-nauja-tvarka-numatytos-zonos-kuriose-ju-skrydziai-gales-buti-ribojami-arba-draudziami/
  • The article said: “not verified” · Does it change? yes: the file and the map can be read, and they contain a single protected-area zone (Žuvintas), without reason NATURE. From "not verified" to "partly, 1 zone".

LU — Luxembourg

LV — Latvia (not in the article)

MD — Moldova

  • UAS file: no official file found · — · —
  • Official map: no official map found (https://www.caa.md/rpas-3-104 → 404)
  • Law:
    • Legea 1538/1998 privind fondul ariilor naturale protejate de stat, version in force since 25/04/2026 (amended by LP53 of 09/04/2026), read in the browser — https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=154107&lang=ro. It contains no rules on flying or on drones: «zbor» appears only in the «zonele lor de zbor» of migratory species.
    • The closest basis remains HG 949/2022, pct. 50 — https://www.caa.md/storage/upload/normative/normativ-reports/732/HG%20nr.949_ro.pdf · «Atunci când definesc zonele geografice UAS din motive de siguranță, de securitate, de protecție a vieții private sau de mediu, Autoritatea Aeronautică Civilă este în drept: 1) să interzică o parte sau totalitatea operațiunilor UAS…»
  • Who authorises: the Autoritatea Aeronautică Civilă (same source), for the zones it establishes; no environmental body named
  • The article said: “not verified” · Does it change? yes: no file, no official map, and the protected areas law does not regulate flying. From "not verified" to "not at all".

ME — Montenegro

MT — Malta (not in the article)

  • UAS file: no downloadable file. The map https://tmcad.idronect.com/map receives the zones from the server, but today they could not be extracted and counted: not verified.
  • Official map: https://www.transport.gov.mt/aviation/drones/geographical-zones-5487 · «These include embassies, nature reserves, hospitals, power stations, correctional facilities, and of course airports and heliports.»
  • Law: not found. S.L. 549.44 does not mention drones.
  • Who authorises: not verified
  • The article said: — (absent) · Does it change? to be added: the map states that it contains nature reserves, count not verified

NL — Netherlands

NO — Norway

PL — Poland

  • UAS file: no public file to download (KML API with a key, https://api.dronemap.pansa.pl/v1/kml). The official map https://dronemap.pansa.pl/ however loads the zones from https://api.dronemap.pansa.pl/v1/zones with an anonymous login. Read on 23/09/2026 after accepting the notices «Informations» and «The precise location of the device». 76 zones out of 3,172 lie over national parks, all of type DRA-R. They cover all 23 national parks: 70 have «PN» in the name, 6 are «DRA-RL 0500 A–F» of Tatrzański Park Narodowy. Example «DRA-R 0507 Kampinoski PN 2»: «Uzyskaj zgodę Zarządzającego strefą geograficzną DRA-R na wykonywanie operacji z użyciem BSP.» and «Procedura uzyskania zgody na lot BSP: https://kampn.gov.pl/loty-dronem». No zones for reserves (rezerwaty) or Natura 2000 sites.
  • Official map: https://www.pansa.pl/nowe-granice-stref-geograficznych-nad-parkami-narodowymi-wazne-informacje-dla-pilotow-bsp/ · «zarządzający parkami wnioskując do PAŻP o wyznaczenie precyzyjnych granic stref, określili obszary, w których drony (BSP) mogą latać bez zgody, oraz te, gdzie zgoda jest potrzebna.»
  • Law: Prawo lotnicze, art. 124 ust. 1 (Dz.U. 2025 poz. 1431) — https://api.sejm.gov.pl/eli/acts/DU/2025/1431/text.pdf · «Zabrania się wykonywania lotów statkami powietrznymi z napędem nad obszarami parków narodowych i rezerwatów przyrody poniżej wysokości względnych podanych przez instytucje zapewniające służby ruchu lotniczego…»
  • Who authorises: the national park director. Example — https://bdpn.gov.pl/dron-w-parku · «…za zgodą Dyrektora Bieszczadzkiego Parku Narodowego»
  • The article said: “yes, on the map — DRA-R zones … checked on Kampinos” · Does it change? no in the class. It is now verified on all 23 parks (76 zones), not on one only. Nature reserves are not on the map.

PT — Portugal

RO — Romania

RS — Serbia

  • UAS file: no public file · — · —
  • Official map: Uredba 69/2026, čl. 4, provides for a mobile app with orange and red zones. The app was not seen.
  • Law:
  • Who authorises: the protected area's manager (and, for nesting sites outside the areas, the nature protection institute) — Uredba čl. 20 st. 3 · «…ако је оператер UAS-а претходно прибавио одобрење управљача заштићеног подручја…»
  • The article said: “no — law only: an order of 2020 …” and, in the method, that the new decree “could not be found on an official page” · Does it change? yes: the decree exists, on cad.gov.rs, and from 29/10/2026 it bans drones over grade I protected areas. The 2020 order is also on an official page.

SE — Sweden

SI — Slovenia (not in the article)

SK — Slovakia (not in the article)

ES — Spain

EEA data used by Dronetrake

5. Natura 2000

6. CDDA (now «Nationally designated areas»)

7. MANAGEMENT table (managing bodies, with their emails)

  • What it contains: field catalogue — https://sdi.eea.europa.eu/catalogue/srv/api/records/46fbc36e-7cf0-4cd5-a718-927d22b2da4b/formatters/xml · field ORG_EMAIL, «E-mail of the body(ies) responsible for the site management»
  • What the EEA and the Commission say about reusing those contacts: the metadata contain no sentence on personal data or privacy. The same CC BY 4.0 licence of DG ENV applies (point 5). The sources that touch the subject are:
    • Standard Data Form, Decision 2011/484/EU, notes §6.1 — https://publications.europa.eu/resource/celex/32011D0484.ENG.xhtml · «Enter the full reference including name, address, phone/fax, e-mail of the authority and/or individual responsible for the management of the site.» The field may therefore contain contacts of natural persons.
    • Decision 2011/833/EU on the reuse of Commission documents, art. 4 — https://publications.europa.eu/resource/celex/32011D0833.ENG.xhtml · «This Decision shall be implemented in full respect of the rules on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data, and in particular Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.»
    • EEA legal notice — https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/legal-notice · «The re-use of certain data may be subject to different conditions, and if so the item concerned is accompanied by a copyright mark or other mention of the specific conditions relating to it.»
  • In short: no official text expressly authorises or forbids reusing the managers' emails. Where the email belongs to a natural person, the rules on personal data apply. This is not a decision, it is to be assessed.

Countries where the article must be corrected

  • AT — Austria: the ED-269 file has 2 NATURE zones (LO R 16 Neusiedler See, LO R 18 Rheindelta). It is not "not at all".
  • IS — Iceland: the public file of the official app has 37 protected-area zones with a ban and the authority Náttúruverndarstofnun. It belongs among the "yes, in the file".
  • RS — Serbia: Uredba 69/2026, čl. 20, bans drones over grade I protected areas from 29/10/2026, and it is on cad.gov.rs. The 2020 order is also on an official page.
  • NL — Netherlands: the ministry's file (17/12/2025) can be read: 0 NATURE out of 743, and the Waddenzee is SENSITIVE. From "not verified" to "not at all in the file".
  • LT — Lithuania: the file and the UTM map can be read, and they have 1 prohibited zone over Žuvintas, belonging to the protected-areas body (reason «Other»). From "not verified" to "partly, 1 zone".
  • GE — Georgia and MD — Moldova: no file, no official zone map, and the protected areas laws (read in the browser) do not regulate flying. From "not verified" to "not at all".
  • Sources to update, outcome unchanged: Croatia (AMC map verified: 44 zones, none about nature), Bulgaria (file of 23/09/2026 on uas.caa.bg), Cyprus (KMZ ver09, 141 zones), Ireland (file of 17/09/2026), totals of CZ, DE, EE, FI and LU.
  • Legal bases to add or clarify:
    • Belgium: explicit drone ban in Walloon reserves.
    • Hungary: decree 4/1998 mentions drones.
    • Spain: RD 517/2024 art. 37.2.b.
    • Poland: the rule applies to all parks, not only Kampinos. The map data contain 76 DRA-R zones over all 23 national parks, none over reserves.
  • Countries to add:
    • Latvia: yes, in the file and on the map (22 out of 409)
    • Slovenia: partly, 1 zone covering the whole Triglav
    • Slovakia: 0 out of 107
    • Liechtenstein: 0 out of 3
    • Malta: the map states nature reserves, count not verified
    • Greece: not at all on the DAGR map; law not verified
  • The count: with these corrections the countries that show protected areas in some form become 14 verified out of 39, plus Italy ("partly" in the article, to be re-verified). France remains "announced" and Malta is not counted.
    • In the file: CZ, DK, EE, DE, NO, PT, CH, IS, LV
    • Partly: AT, SI, LT (and IT, to be re-verified)
    • On the map only: PL, ES

Countries still "not verified"

  • IT — Italy: the d-flight file requires an operator login. Postponed until an operator login is available.
  • MT — Malta: the tmcad.idronect.com map did not return the zones in a readable form, so they cannot be counted. It is verified only that Transport Malta lists nature reserves among the zones.
  • GR — Greece, the law only: the Samaria Park website returns a critical error, uas.hcaa.gov.gr is blocked by the Chrome extension, and uas.hcaa.gr and et.gr do not open. The map, on the other hand, is verified.
  • Only the maps, not the files:
    • Netherlands: the Aeret map was not opened. GoDrone, on the other hand, is verified.
    • Romania: the CAA page has a captcha.
  • Completed on 23/09/2026 in the browser:
    • Estonia, Lithuania and Poland: after accepting the notices.
    • Croatia (AMC map), Latvia (airspace.lv), Georgia and Moldova (laws), Greece (DAGR map), Netherlands (GoDrone, after the disclaimer's «Ok» button).

What you may reuse

This article was written to be used. You may quote it, take the figures, translate it and republish it in full — including in commercial publications — with a single request: credit the source as Dronetrake, with a link to this page, and carry the verification date. On this subject the date matters as much as the finding, because portals change and AIRAC cycles last 28 days.

If you are working on a piece and need the numbers as they stand on your publication day, write to us: we will run the checks again and send them over, country by country, along with every address we tried. If you find an error, better still — we publish the method alongside the results precisely so that it can be taken apart.

Press materials — logo, images, fact sheet — in the press room. Editorial contact: press@dronetrake.com — answered personally, usually within one working day.

Dronetrake is a European platform for professional drone operators. This survey grew out of a concrete problem: giving an honest answer to the question "may I fly here?" in every country where our users work.

Trabalhas com drones? Este levantamento nasceu de uma pergunta que fazemos todos os dias: «posso voar aqui?». Se também a fazes, conta-nos como trabalhas — três perguntas, e dizemos-te do que precisarias.

Conta-nos o teu cenário

← Voltar à sala de imprensa